Pregnant woman ends her pregnancy for an adopted child
July 20th, 2011 by Olivia | Posted in News | 68 Comments »
From QQ:
Gao Xue is a 31-year-old woman living in a small village in Chong Qing. Now she becomes the center of a heated discussion online. when she decided to give up her own baby and husband for an unrelated baby she found on the street. She had an abortion when she is 5 months pregnant in order to concentrate on bringing up the adopted baby.
On a cold windy night on 2007 November, Gao Xue and her husband was on their way back home from work when they found an infant in the garbage. The baby boy had turned blue in the cold. "This baby is sick. He has been abandoned three times." the passing street cleaner told the couple. Looking at the baby, Gao Xue, who was 3-month pregnant, and her husband decided to take the baby back home and later named the baby Doudou.
Doudou was very sick. He refused to drink milk and seemed to have problem with breathing. Gao wanted to take Doudou to the hospital to check but her husband didn’t agree. Her husband even asked her to abandon Doudou as soon as possible.
Gao was very worried about Doudou. After several discussions with her husband with no result, she lied to her husband that she was sick and needed money to go to the hospital. She got 2000 yuan and immediately sent Doudou to the hospital. The result was not good. Doudou suffered many diseases, among others heart disease.
When her husband knew about that they had the first serious fight. But Gao insisted that she should keep Doudou. "He’s alive. He has been abandoned 3 times. Do you want him to lose his life?" Gao Xue said to her husband.
Because of the cold weather, Doudou caught pneumonia. "It takes money to go to the doctor. And he needs someone to take care of him. Once my baby is born, it would take even more money."Gao Xue said. She worried once the baby is born, she would have no time to take care of Doudou. Thus she made a decision which most people couldn’t understand or agree: She had an abortion.
"If you have the abortion, I’ll divorce you." Her husband said. "We can still have another baby. But once Doudou lose the chance of treatment, he would die." Gao tried to explain her decision to her husband. Their marriage was under pressure.
In March 2008, Gao Xue left Doudou to her mother. Her husband secretly "stole" Doudou and was going to abandon him at the entrance of the hospital. But Gao Xue found out and took Doudou back home.
Her husband still want to keep the marriage and told Gao Xue if she agreed to give up Doudou they can still be together. But Gao Xue refused, "You can take the house, all the money, I don’t want anything as long as Doudou is with me." They finally were divorced on July 2008. The house they bought together and all the savings went to her husband. She has only Doudou.
When asked about the reason for adopting Doudou, Gao Xue said, it has something to do with her personal experience. When she was young, her parents send away the youngest sister for economic reasons. The foster parents were very nice to her sister and gave all their savings 5000 yuan to her sister when they passed away. She wanted to be like the foster parents of her sister.
While some people and media praise Gao as being a great mother, that she sacrifices her marriage and her baby for Doudou, many hold a different opinion, especially with her abortion. Many people accuse her of being cruel and rather irresponsible to the unborn baby.
Tags: abortion, Adoption, child, childhood, Chinese women, divorce, Marriage, mother
“She had an abortion when she is 5 months pregnant in order to concentrate on bringing up the adopted baby.”
Oh lets murder my child so I can display charity to this kid. Are Chinese stupid or are they just stupid? She probably thought she was doing something good. Chinese are more jacked than I ever imagined. Oh wait this is China, where every and any jackassness thrives.
TAP SUM BONG!
I cant believe we let these people make our baby & pet food.
China should exist only for us to be reminded of how low we can become.
TAP SUM BONG!
Please stop pretending to be Korean and you’re making us real Koreans look bad.
It’s strange how obsessed you are with this site that you feel compelled to post so many times and stir up discord among Asians.
Jessica
“Please stop pretending to be Korean and you’re making us real Koreans look bad.”
Why don’t you stop pretending to be Korean?
“It’s strange how obsessed you are with this site that you feel compelled to post so many times and stir up discord among Asians.”
You will be crying your fat ass when you see how jacked Chinese will have ruined the world in the near future and think that korean_guy was prophetic concerning the Chinese. Asian discord? I ain’t creating the discord, China is ruining the world.
TAP SUM BONG!
> I ain’t creating the discord, …
Ah, you’re from the US, somewhere countryside’ish I guess. Nobody who learned EN as a second language will use “ain’t” because that word does not exist. “I ai not” or what is it supposed to mean? Go back to the bible belt, haobuhao.
some
There are other issues more pressing that my use of the word “ain’t”. For one, the issue of Chinese ruining the world.
TAP SUM BONG!
some
I AIN’T the one aborting babies.
korean_guy is a sack of shit. And he isn’t funny. If the mods want to do us all a favor, ban korean_guy.
Or at least give us an ignore button so we can visit this site without having to witness this rat’s comments.
Otherwise, he’s such a stain in this place that it’s almost not worth coming here and reading the comments.
Honestly, the guy must have a 3 inch penis or something. There’s just something incredibly wrong with korean_guy.
+1
John
“And he isn’t funny.”
I never tried to be, but Billy Hung is pathetically funny looking.
“Or at least give us an ignore button ”
Wish I had that button every time I meet a Chinaman.
“the guy must have a 3 inch penis or something.”
What’s with Chinese and their proclivity with cocks!
“There’s just something incredibly wrong with korean_guy.”
Compared to a Chinese I’m a pleasure to be wtih.
TAP SUM BONG!
Completely dumb bitch. She literally murdered her 5 month to “take in another child” when it was completely unnecessary
I bet you she feels righteous about it too.
Dumb blind bitch.
Fetuses aren’t people.
It takes a great deal of inner strengith to buck family and social demands in order to do the right thing. Good for her.
You’re an idiot. Once conception happens it a living human, just not “born” out of the womb yet.
And yes, the direct intent that the woman had was to deliberately end her baby’s life. By definition it’s MURDER.
By your reasoning stillborn is manslaugther. Lots of women would go to jail!
Ergo, abortion is not the same as murder. life is more complicated and not black-and-white.
Jon
“By your reasoning stillborn is manslaugther.”
Interestingly you used the word “manslaughter” rather than “murder”. No, stillborn is death by natural causes, unless the woman intentionally hurt herself in order to kill the unborn baby. Motive determines the guilt. Manslaughter still implies negligence even if premeditated motive was not present. If a mother neglects her body while pregnant she may be guilty of negligence.
“Lots of women would go to jail!”
Yes some should if found to be negligent.
“Ergo, abortion is not the same as murder”
Ergo, your logic sucks!
“life is more complicated and not black-and-white.”
I agree, you have to look deeper and you have to take each case individually. And life is not all gray area either. Some are in the gray and some are in the black and white.
The above bitch committed murder!
TAP SUM BONG!
TROLL.
some
As of July 2007 China remains a shit hole country.
SHE BANG!
As of July 2011 China remains a shit hole country.
a stillborn child dies of natural causes and is not by the deliberate attempt to end the life on the part of the mother. this is not what Nagkra is talking about. This woman deliberately aborted her child to have another. This does not make sense. At five months is even worse. I am not saying that abortion is murder… what I am saying is what this woman did is morally wrong.
M
“Fetuses aren’t people.”
Fetuses are human beings. By your logic of considering fetuses non human being I’d say all Chinese must be considered sub human, le chinois cattles. Even your pathetic ass was deemed worthy enough to be given the chance to breath and bitch.
“It takes a great deal of inner strengith to buck family and social demands in order to do the right thing.”
Inner strength my ass. Inner evil motives. The bitch is murderer PERIOD. She murdered her child and was willing to leave the marriage to take on a orphan kid. You can’t get dumber or more immoral than that. Talk about throwing the baby with the bath water, the bitch literally did. China is the most morally bankrupt nation on earth.
TAP SUM BONG!
I’m afraid I must agree with Billy Hung. This is the most fucked up story I’ve ever heard.
老外
“This is the most fucked up story I’ve ever heard.”
Actually the story of CCP the party lead by Mao “the Dung” subsequently murder of 55+million Chinese (and still counting) is more of a fucked story than this. The above story is the legacy of the CCP thanks to Daddy Mao “the Dung”.
TAP SUM BONG!
I disagree. It’s a lot easier to kill someone you don’t know (Mao) than your own baby. It takes a special kind of psycho to murder their own child, and behave the way she did. Why not take care of both children? She didn’t have to destroy 3 lives to save 1.
老外
“It’s a lot easier to kill someone you don’t know (Mao) than your own baby.”
I agree. Even murderers love their kids.
TAP SUM BONG!
..and i believe that you are no human being at all ‘coz you have a brain of a fetus.
Obviously you have never been pregnant. I have just suffered a miscarriage at two months pregnant. Two weeks before, I had an internal sonogram – at that time I heard the heartbeat of my unborn child. Yes, it was a fetus, but it was my child and I grieve for the loss just the same. It is a shame that this woman did not see her own child as being thrown away just as the baby she adopted. Neither situation is right. She may have corrected one child being tossed with the garbage but in turn she created the same by her abortion. This is not family and social demands. She threw her child away. And at 5 months it was a child. It had a gender, it had a working brain, it had a heartbeat. It could blink it’s eyes and move its arms, legs, fingers and responded to stimuli.
This is more of a testament to the sickness of Chinese society than anything else. Kill your baby if he is ill, no help from the government, sick hospital fees (for low income groups) and that general no-respect-for-life feeling that is so hard to explain and pinpoint exactly. Basically living in China gave this woman only one choice: abandon the poor kid or abort your 5 month old fetus. Fuck that shit. I’m so glad I can leave at any time I want.
xiongmao
“Basically living in China gave this woman only one choice: abandon the poor kid or abort your 5 month old fetus.”
Although Chinese leaders have committed the biggest crime in turning China into a immoral shit hole, that still doesn’t leave this woman innocent of what she did. She wasn’t insane and stupidity is not recognize by courts in excusing such horrible act. This woman had a choice. She could have sent the orphan away and kept her baby and maintained a strong marriage. She chose to murder her baby, and risk alienating the husband and thus the marriage.
“I’m so glad I can leave at any time I want.”
Yes you are lucky!
TAP SUM BONG!
It’s not a “baby” it’s a fetus and I don’t buy the religious shit about those concepts. I do however agree that 5 months is VERY late for an abortion and I recognize that people at least have the right to argue whether 5 months actually counts as a baby.
Xiongmao
“I don’t buy the religious shit about those concepts.”
One doesn’t have to think it as a religious concept.
“I do however agree that 5 months is VERY late…”
Why? Because it resembles a baby more so than when it’s a fetus? By what standard is 5 months deems late? You are either a human being or not, you are not more human at 5 month compared to at conception.
“I recognize that people at least have the right to argue whether 5 months actually counts as a baby.”
No such rights exist…unless you may be appealing to the right called freedom of speech.
Advice to the husband: this bitch has more immoral behavior coming in the future. Watch out!!
TAP SUM BONG!
Keep Chinese within their borders. Don’t let them out!!
TAP SUM BONG!
But it’s OK to let a banana like you out, right?
vic2u
“But it’s OK to let a banana like you out, right?”
Damn right!
I have morals biatch! Chinese don’t.
Just because you’re dirty ass poor doesn’t mean you can act a-China-fool.
TAP SUM BONG!
This woman made a choice, within the confines of her ability to help a living human child live. She made the choice at 5 months to abort the zygotes currently occupying her womb to allow for the economic reality of caring for a living child in need of her help. if only the people posting here had a n ounce of her compassion or courage there wpuld not be so many unwanted or abandoned babies in the world.
@ korean_guy or Nagkra_joo. you are a byproduct of the bronze age and the barbarism inherent in ideologies rooted in such worthless soil. Grow up and face the 20th century and it’s problems with the maturity of adults rather than the blandishments of illiterate, ignorant children.
“This woman made a choice, within the confines of her ability to help a living human child live.”
You fucking dumbass. It doesn’t matter if she was helping another child.
She commited murder against another, plain simple. And through the process is even willing to break up with her husband??? I like how you disguise the fact it was a living human inside her stomach with the word “zygotes”. Learn some biology, fuckhead; 5 months is late and is already on its way out. And once again it’s at conception that life is bared.
Calling us the byproduct of the bronze age and barbarism. What are you, retarded?
“if only the people posting here had a n ounce of her compassion or courage there wpuld not be so many unwanted or abandoned babies in the world.”
Right, so that’s why you defend her murder and then state if only we had her compassion and courage there wouldn’t be “so many unwanted or abandoned babies in the world”.
You fucking backwards ass idiot.
Your mother should have spit you out.
A fetus is less alive than a snake. Theres pretty much no consciousness.
A little boy, already born, is highly aware, and feels it all.
Its far more cruel to end a 5yr olds life, than a non aware, non-developed fetus.
Its far more cruel that such a child experiences pain and suffering, where as the fetus will not.
What about sperm? millions of them die in the very process of trying to get to the egg. And maybe trillions die a day from men watching Porn.
Is this Evil? Wrong?
Is it right to let the kid die on his own? Why is that any More right to ignore and leave the kid to die?
While I would be upset at the wife if it were my child… I can understand that reasons why she did what she did.
It surely would have been a more happy story if the kid wasnt laden with diseases. Then again, the woman could have very well birthed a child even worse than the one she found… as well as carrying the guilt of leaving the other to die.
Her Humanity and compassion is commendable.
Something that the resident arrogant Korean here could never understand.
Are you retarded? Actually, you sound 10 times more retarded than the woman in the article.
AOK, another completely blind moron of a liberal.
The exact same sperm and egg is joined together to create the *exact same* baby that comes out of the womb 9 months later.
What difference does it make if the “being” were 15 days old or 9 months? THE ANSWER IS THAT IT’S THE EXACT SAME BABY AND LIFE, ONLY YOU USE POLITICS TO DISGUISE THAT FACT AND REFUSE TO CONSIDER ANYTHING PERCEIVED TO BE A FLESHY ATTRACTIVE BABY TO BE CONSIDERED LEGITIMATE LIFE.
Fuck you and kthuuluu. You two are probably closet homosexuals who think this sexual perversion is harmless and righteous as well. And you probably defend serial killers too. Morons.
How hard is it to understand? A fetus is NOT a baby. It can’t feel or think, it’s not conscious in any way. Just because something has POTENTIAL to become something that is alive does not mean you are comitting murder by revoking this potential. By your reasoning, any woman who refuses unprotected sex at any time should go to jail for murder because she just killed off a potential baby.
Boy. It’s confirmed: you and AOK are definitely retarded.
Your only argument is calling people retarded. Please, present new arguments.
“Just because something has POTENTIAL to become something that is alive does not mean you are comitting murder by revoking this potential. By your reasoning, any woman who refuses unprotected sex at any time should go to jail for murder because she just killed off a potential baby.”
Absolutely spot on. It amazes me that so many people find that so difficult to understand. Sperm = potential baby, egg = potential baby, fertilised egg = potential baby with slightly more potential, but nothing more. Nature wastes millions of sperm, countless eggs and almost half of all conceptions result in “spontaneous abortion” – where a fertilised egg is lost without the mother ever being aware she was pregnant! (That’s something for the religionists to think about.)
Politicians and doctors who insist on setting the legal abortion period depending on how “viable” a foetus is are making exactly the same mistake. The question is NOT “potential” or “viability”, it’s this: at what point in the development of a baby in the womb does it become “conscious”, in the sense that humans magically attribute to themselves and no other animal?
As for Mr. “TAP SUM [Help me I'm insecure!] BONG” above, perhaps he’d enjoy some related reading:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/04/04/us-korea-abortion-idUSSEO35121820080404
“Abortions have been illegal for almost as long as South Korea has existed but, in an uneasy compromise, law enforcement officials have been willing to look the other way as long as qualified doctors perform the operation.”
Ooh, classy.
Craig
“by revoking this potential.”
Revoking the potential is called: using a fucking condom. Once conception is made any talk of potential goes out the window! Revoking a fetus is KILLING a human being.
TAP SUM BONG!
Craig
“Abortions have been illegal for almost as long as South Korea has existed but, in an uneasy compromise, law enforcement officials have been willing to look the other way as long as qualified doctors perform the operation. Ooh, classy.”
So what is your point? Abortion happens in S. Korea? Murder is murder in China or S. Korea. U.S. has murdered 50+ children since abortion was made legal? But concerning this post this bitch’s action of aborting her 5 month old child take the depravity to a whole ‘nother China level.
TAP SUM BONG!
correction:
U.S. has murdered 50+ million children since abortion was made legal?
“Revoking a fetus is KILLING a human being.”
That’s an emotive sentence, and it’s technically true, but if you really believe that all the value of human life is present the instant two cells come together, then you’re living in the world of spirits and magic, not neurons and synapses.
Any evangelical tendencies you want to come clean about?
Craig
“That’s an emotive sentence,”
No it is not.
“but if you really believe that all the value of human life is present the instant two cells come together,”
from your fallacious logic then a child is less of a human being than an adult. and from that logic than Chinese are less of a human since they are depraved nation. As much as I hate Chinese and their behavior I would not say their lives are worth less than a wonderfully behaving civilized American.
Is a person with no arms or legs less of a person than someone who has all their limbs?
Once we start to give value points human beings purely on their pragmatic worth we have hit a moral low…a low which China is flirting with.
“Any evangelical tendencies you want to come clean about?”
I already know you are for gay rights, pro-choice & pro-environment.
Even a moral pagan would agree with me.
TAP SUM BONG!
Craig you are truly a sad demonic individual.
I have been a RN for over 10 years. I have never nor would I ever work in a setting that performs abortions, but I am well aware of what some of my colleagues have witnessed and participated in abortions. Did you know that this so-called “potential” ( aborted fetuses) often come out crying. When when their nervous systems are not sliced and diced, by the butchers hands, they often come out crying. Surgical nurses and techs must identify fully identifiable limbs to ensure that they are not retained “products of conception”. You can break down your so called equation, but any person born with a conscious and basic intelligence realize that this is not a gray area.
I can’t believe that it would be even entertained that abortion was the most favorable outcome simply because the sperm donor was black. I also don’t believe that she was a victim of rape. How convenient!. I am very aware that In China there is much prejudice against black people, but I was not aware of the Sadistic mentality .
korean_guy
“from your fallacious logic then a child is less of a human being than an adult.”
“Is a person with no arms or legs less of a person than someone who has all their limbs?”
Those are bizarre interpretations of my very simple argument. Where on earth did you learn critical thinking?
What I was getting at was this: some cells with no BRAIN – no mind, no thoughts, no feelings, no dreams – does not count as life at all. Nothing to do with arms, legs, or development after birth. From this “fallacious logic”, we conclude that:
- disabled people are every bit as valuable as the able-bodied (duh)
- people of every race and age (after brain development) have the same right to life (duh)
- animals have a right to life (you don’t say!)
- plants may be killed with impunity (unless they support the life of other animals, which they usually do)
- the “higher” animals have a greater right to life (presumably you also agree – didn’t you murder a chicken yesterday?
My absolutes are these: that a baby at any age after a brain has developed – irrespective of whether it’s been born – is a sacred human life, and that a ball of cells with no mind is not.
Delores, you’ve also misunderstood me. If a baby was crying as it was aborted, then obviously that’s a baby that’s too developed to abort, and it’s a horrible crime. I’m very much in favour of strict limits on abortion term limits, for the reason I gave in an earlier post – that the current reasoning for setting those limits – “viability” – is just as illogical and “demonic” as thinking that a zygote is infinitely precious while the single sperm and egg cells it came from are worthless (that’s you two).
I’m also fully aware by the way that the abortion culture in China generally is way beyond the pale. Hospitals here treat it like a convenience, advertising with happy slogans and big smiles – it’s disgusting.
But to re-iterate: a zygote is worth less than any human life, but at some stage in development it acquires the same worth. To save an awful lot of mothers and babies a whole lot of suffering, you need to set that limit somewhere and you need to do it based on scientific fact, not spiritual gobbledegook.
craig
“What I was getting at was this: some cells with no BRAIN – no mind, no thoughts, no feelings, no dreams – does not count as life at all.”
Then a person in a vegetative state is consider less of a human being? Why not just consider a baby in a mother’s womb a lump of flesh? Actually people already think that. My criticism to you is the simplicity in biological state does not necessarily deem it less than. You call it a zygote, and I call it beginning state of human development.
“that a baby at any age after a brain has developed – irrespective of whether it’s been born – is a sacred human life, and that a ball of cells with no mind is not.”
“a zygote is worth less than any human life, but at some stage in development it acquires the same worth.”
You are adding human intrinsic value to a lump of flesh only after it starts to develop a brain? By what power and authority do you come up with this?
What stops form another person in higher chain than you saying a kid at the age of 5 and below has less of a value of human ness compared to an adult because the kid has not developed social skills or even biological development that an adult has acquired. Your absolutes are arbitrary and can be usurped by anyone and everyone. A sperm and an egg by themselves do not create anything.
“To save an awful lot of mothers and babies a whole lot of suffering, you need to set that limit ”
Yes I agree we need to educate and set limits, stop fucking without contraceptive!! And if the contraceptive fails, TOUGH. You live with the consequences of your actions.
“based on scientific fact, not spiritual gobbledegook.”
You are such a hopeless humanist! Science can’t tell us what we ought to do. Science only tells us what’s apparent (I say this because humans are limited in their capacity to see what actually is, even in high Science levels and endeavors).
TAP SUM BONG!
While drawing the line over when the baby becomes ‘sentient’ according to a scientific definition is very difficult as pregnancy progresses and technology emerges that allows babies born prematurely, I am inclined to believe like Craig that a line CAN and DOES exist somewhere. That is, there is a period after the sperm and egg meet (i.e. let’s use a week for the sake of argument) when abortion is both legal and seen as acceptable. I base this belief on the scientific concept of sentience and the legal view of fetuses.
For the legal authority behind this, I draw on Western law. In the US, the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L. Ed. 2d 147 ruled that a woman has a constitutionally guaranteed unqualified right to abortion in the first trimester of her pregnancy. It’s only for pregnancy in the later phases does this issue become LEGALLY contentious in the US. In Canada, the span of time for LEGAL abortion is even longer as a fetus is only considered a human being and afforded full rights as a human when “when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother whether or not it has completely breathed, it has an independent circulation or the navel string is severed.” (s.223 of the Criminal Code). With the previous example, it would be clearly legal in the US or Canada to abort a week in. Consider this the ‘authority’ by which a zygote can be deemed a lump of flesh without the police banging down your door and arresting you for getting rid of it.
By sentience I am referring to human brain development as observed by science. Only when a brain starts to form can a being even START on the path to being sentient. With human fetuses, this happens in the THIRD WEEK after fertilization. There are various sources over this fact but I will leave one here in case anyone chooses to dispute this:
http://main.zerotothree.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ter_key_brainFAQ
What this all means is that the zygote clearly cannot think or feel any time before then. We could scientifically debate further when the brain really starts to ‘work’ but I am happy to just to point out the fact that it is very clear that the before the third week, all that is inside is just a bunch of cells. Nothing more. Just as the law did, science would support the fact that you CLEARLY did not kill a ‘human being’ if you aborted before the third week. I remind you once again of my conservative one-week example. I note that whether or not brain function is compromised later on (i.e. person comes out retarded or becomes a vegetable) is irrelevant to this approach as we are only talking about whether or not the brain has even started developing.
What emerges from all this is the rational perspective. That is, unless you are a hopeless religious nutjob, it would be virtually impossible for you to deny the fact a zygote is not a human being a day in. Please remember that throughout all of this, there are laws and precedents in developed Western countries which support the perspective that there IS a period after fertilization when abortion IS legal and not murder of a human being. As with the spirit of these laws, I refuse to entertain the argument of ‘potential to be human’ because it becomes an endless slippery slope and is but a distraction to the real issue which is whether or not the fetus was alive (sentient) and was legally entitled to the rights of a human when you aborted it.
If it has a beating heart, then it’s alive. It’s a living thing. And, if what you say is true – a fetus is not a baby, then what is it? A ball of nothing? Just flesh?
Bring you lady over for a sperm donation.
You can raise my kid….
The story is a fake.
Just like everything else in China, GDP, growth, etc all fake ass…and a cheap fake at that.
SHE BANG!
I agree with everybody above, nobody wins.
The mother is wrong about her own unborn and she is right to save another life.
But like in many cases, you make your own mistake.
vic2u
“you make your own mistake.”
What’s with Chinese re-characterizing murder as a “mistake”? This trend is disturbing but expected: China the most immoral country on the face of the earth. This bitch didn’t make a mistake, she murder her unborn child.
I guess then green teeth fat pig Mao “the Dung” made a 55+ million dead Chinese mistake? Did Hitler make and 6+ million dead Jew mistake?
Chinese are hopeless.
TAP SUM BONG!
You know just like when the US army bombs out a wedding party in Iraq and kills a few hundred people there they call it a mistake, so China makes bigger mistakes.
What you gonna do?
South Korea kills millions of North Koreans every year and we in the west don’t care.
Why you care about China’s business?
vic2u
“You know just like when the US army bombs out a wedding party in Iraq and kills a few hundred people there they call it a mistake,”
It unfortunate and there are casualties in war. There are people who die under friendly fire.
“so China makes bigger mistakes.”
Intentional murder of 50+ million Chinese is not a mistake. Calling murder a “mistake” is a big mistake.
“What you gonna do?”
I would love to contain Chiense within their borders.
“South Korea kills millions of North Koreans every year and we in the west don’t care.”
Stop reading Chiense media. You’ve been fed lies by Chinese media. N Korea only has about 20 million people, a size of a big Chinese family (Chinese need to stop breeding). If they kill several million N Koreans per year there would be no more left. Chinese kill more N Koreans than anyone on earth by sending N Korean defectors back to that shit country.
“Why you care about China’s business?”
China is cancer to the world. If you were diagnosed with cancer wouldn’t you want to go see a doctor and eradicated it ASAP? Yes even your greasy Chinese stank ass would agree.
TAP SUM BONG!
She was right and you people think well before hitting your keyboard. Only an oceanic heart can do this, accepting difficulties for a good cause.
Hats off to this lady.
Then this means your mother should have aborted you and instead adopt a random baby. Yes, it makes perfect sense the way you say it.
She could have contacted the government department in charge of these things, it doesn’t have to be her burden, she would have given the random baby a chance to live with proper care. The ends does not justify her means, both babies would have lived. China should re-educate her for good.
Meth
“She could have contacted the government department in charge of these things,”
Chinese government is the biggest problem. They perpetuate immoral behaviors by compulsively and forcefully making their subjects to worship their religion, the Chinese Communist Party.
“China should re-educate her for good.”
She’s already a product of Chinese education/brainwashing, which leads to immoral unethical behaviors. It’s like wanting to clean with a dirty rag, pointless.
TAP SUM BONG!
You are a retard
TAP SUM BONG! – Your mum
“TAP SUM BONG! – Your mum”
No, his dad. The bastard’s mum just can’t get enough of Chinaman dick, she wants to suck each and every one but not her son because he is a bastard, not Chinaman, he therefore spew his hatred here thinking that we care.
Suck my dick, you and your mum.
I would actually risk my life going to China just to stomp on this bitch’s face (which means I’m bringing lots of sandwiches and bottled water for the duration of my trip).
TAP SUM BONG!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/jul/15/david-sedaris-chinese-food-chicken-toenails
There is nothing that should inhibit you to write down your emotions, thoughts, feelings, ideas, dreams and realities. Please feel free to share your experiences with others by jotting them down on a piece of paper of the pregnancy journal. However, avoid exaggerating things. Few years down the line, while going through your pregnancy journal, you will be delighted.